Reps Probe Alleged Certificate Racketeering By MDAsReps Probe Alleged Certificate Racketeering By MDAs

The House of Representatives has passed through Second Reading a bill which seeks to halt the imposition of Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination, UTME, on Candidates denied admission into universities on yearly basis.

The private member bill sponsored by Tolulope Sadipe, seeks to amend the Joint Admission and Matriculation Board Act and for related matters, by overhauling the existing Act most especially the validity of scores, tenure of Registrar and membership of the Board.

Sections 5(1a) and 5(2) of the Principal Act are amended. Section 5(1a) is ‘amended also to add sub-section (i) and (ii) under (a) as follows to insert the score validity of the examination:

5(1a)(I) the general control of the conduct of matriculation examinations and admissions to courses leading to award of First Degrees. Higher National Diploma, National Diploma, and Nigeria Certificate in Education by Universities (by whatever name called), Monotechnic/Polytechnics (by whatever name called) and Colleges of Education (by whatever name called) in Nigeria which shall be valid for four years:

5(Ia) (ii) the conduct of entrance examinations and admission to all award of First Degrees, Higher National Diploma, National Diploma, and Nigeria Certificate in Education by Universities (by whatever name called), Monotechnic/Polytechnics (by whatever name called) and Colleges of Education (by whatever name called) in Nigeria which shall be valid for four years:

5(2) for the avoidance of doubt; the Board shall only be responsible for determining matriculation requirements and conducting examinations and admissions to tertiary institutions in Nigeria offering academic programmes leading to the award of First Degrees. Higher National Diploma, National Diploma, Nigeria Certificate in Education, and any other Diploma.’

In her lead debate, Sadipe frowned at the undue financial burden imposed on parents and their children who are subjected to untold hardship despite passing the examination.

She said: “When you look at the number of students that apply to the universities every year and the number that get in, it is definitely not their fault. So why should they be penalised?

“Everywhere in the world, there is no such exam that is valid or one year.”

Sadipe observed that Graduate Management Admission Test, GMAT is valid for a period of 5 years.

While noted that a lot of parents are struggling to send their children and wards to schools are being burdened by JAMB to pay for the examinations on year on year basis.

According to her, most of the students who passed the JAMB examinations are also being compelled to write the same examination without any justifications.

While calling for a paradigm shift, the lawmaker said: “We should not continue this way, likening us as a society to a ritualist, who sacrifices human beings for money. Why should our youths, our children be sacrificed on the altar of revenue generation by JAMB?”

The Deputy Minority leader, Toby Okechukwu who called for redress, affirmed that parents and their wards are suffering from double jeopardy.

Okechukwu said; “The sponsor has discussed the economics of it. What she’s saying is that our children and the parents who fund their education have not just been suffering double jeopardy but have been suffering several jeopardies.

“What’s impossible is the prudence behind this amendment. I think the bill should go to committee so that the mischief she wants to cure doesn’t lead to a situation where we create another mischief. We should try to cure this problem she has raised.”

However, another lawmaker, Uzoma Nkem-Abonta requested for further clarification on the issue.

Abonta said; “The picture is even clearer to me, the author of this Bill, is saying that other examinations outside this clime, last for five years within its eligibility. For example, if you take the GMAT, they can use it to grade you within the past three years.

“Is she asking that one sitting should be used for five years to gain admission? If the answer is yes then we create more problems than we seek to solve. One sitting should also be used for five years to gain admission? if the answer is no, then I don’t see the purpose for the amendment.”

Also at the plenary, the House directed JAMB authorities to immediately conduct mop-up examinations for the affected candidates.